It is more important for governments to spend money to improve internet access than to improve public transportation.
In today progressive and sophisticate world where we live government has a profound effect on society. governments should consume government funding in an accurate way. In this line of though, some people believe that government should devote public budget to boost internet access, while many others posit this notion, stating that leaders should dedicate monitory for developing public transportation. I, personally, concur with the latter group for two main reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
First of all, lack of public transportation is a critical issue for any governments. In this modern era, not only people need to utilize transportation every day, but also using public transportation increase day after day. To be more specific, with the improving technology and present of huge cities, distance between home and work of people get longer. As a result, lack of public transportation, put environment on the merge of sever danger. Government should raise quality of public transportation to prohibit individuals from using own car, so air has not polluted anymore.
Secondly, as time humans coming into existence, they are trying to discover discrete sort of transportation, whereas internet had been found newly. To clarify, human dependent to transportation particularly these days. By growing population, cities more than the past require to pay attention of government for prevent and decrease of traffic. By improving public transportation, government is able to solve the traffic issue and people utilize bus in order to use private car.
To sum up, I assume that government ought to spend their budget on public transportation in order to spend on bring wide internet access. Not only by improving public transportation government abolish air pollution, but also reduce the traffic concern. As for this writer's advice, I urge government open up opportunity for every one to access facilities even who lives in rural.
- ice age 80
- Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. 76
- workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. 71
- It is more important for governments to spend money to improve internet access than to improve public transportation. 76
- asteroids 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Governments
...nment has a profound effect on society. governments should consume government funding in an...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an accurate way" with adverb for "accurate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ments should consume government funding in an accurate way. In this line of though, some people be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...blic transportation, put environment on the merge of sever danger. Government should rais...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 266, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...reduce the traffic concern. As for this writers advice, I urge government open up oppor...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, as for, sort of, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.0752688172 322% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45928338762 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10673035419 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625407166124 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8630344135 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.75 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375507266457 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107775366108 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665429120294 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226221985139 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058636046112 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.