Some people think that with the increasing use of mobile phones and computers, people lose the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the question of the excessive use of smart devices, such as smartphone and computers has become a fiercely controversial issue. Some people assert that the increasing use of these causes damage to people's ability related to direct communication, while others argue otherwise. I wholeheartedly agree with the former stand. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention will be discussed alongside relevant examples.
First of all, it seems difficult to refute the idea that the development of technology makes it possible for people to contact others regardless of time and places. However, this phenomenon has exert a number of negative influences on face-to-face communication. An obvious reason is that a myriad of modern people are reluctant to keep in touch with others in reality. To exemplify, one recent study conducted by the Seoul National University illustrates that the number of people who have difficulty in conversation with others directly has increased after social networking applications, such as Facebook and Instagram, were introduced. Researchers analyzed a multitude of reasons for this social phenomenon and the main reason turned out that most people considered face-to-face conversation placing a huge amount of burden on them.
In addition, information and communication technology leads to numerous changes in the filed of occupation, which enables some people to deal with their affairs at house instead of commuting to work. These people contact their colleagues online, which prevents them from developing skills related to face-to-face communication since they spend most of their time on the Internet. As a brief illustration, one of my friend who works as a consultant at his house was extroverted in the past. However, he is accustomed to his work and he has lost social skills.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that smart gadget has negative effects on people's communication skills for the reasons discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-10 | duyenle1001 | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-06 | LUCIALUSO | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-23 | LUCIALUSO | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | binhan_04 | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-14 | nghiemngoc2912 | 73 | view |
- Q13 The spread of multinational companies and the increase of globalisation produces positive effects for everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- Q7 Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Q19 Developing countries require help offered by international organizations to ensure healthy and sustainable development Some people think that financial aid is important Others believe that practical aid and advice is more important Discuss both these 89
- QQ9 With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas 89
- Q1 Over the last few decades there has been an increase in international tourism Some people think that tourism is beneficial for local communities and should be encouraged To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...ncreasing use of these causes damage to peoples ability related to direct communication...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'exerted'.
Suggestion: exerted
...nd places. However, this phenomenon has exert a number of negative influences on face...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 838, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lacing a huge amount of burden on them. In addition, information and communicati...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that smart ga...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48328267477 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09454438489 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580547112462 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.566193783 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.266666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26758351218 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807654183637 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660440450168 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146433740771 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535733449876 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.