Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental degradation is definitely a pressing problem in the current times. With the ever-growing population and proportionately increasing anthropogenic activities, the time has arrived for the human race to intensely think of solutions to save the ecosystem. Though individual contribution can be effective, involvement of authorities is the key.
Ruling bodies have the ability to bring a bigger change when compared to one person. If the governments educate their citizens and disseminate various initiatives through which we can preserve the environment, it reaches broader audience. Running campaigns such as encouraging commuters to use public transport or car-pool to work, developing community parks, imposing ban on usage of degraded plastic would truly cater the need of the hour.
Nevertheless, it is the shared responsibility of the people to heed to the governing bodies and implement them. The reasons why measures by central bodies are more effective is that these regulatory organisations have the supreme power to mandate the regulations and fine the ones who do not obey the rules. Birmingham in the United Kingdom is an empirical example to exhibit this. This small town has a no-pollution day every month where the residents are forbidden to use their own four-wheeler on that day and if they breach the rule , they are penalised with 1000$ fine and a three month community service. This acts as a deterrent to the locals. These major changes benefitting the society and environment cannot be achieved by one. Hence the an enormous responsibility is on the government for the true transformation to protect the environment.
To conclude, though individual's acts contribute to safeguard the environment, the onus is now on the governments to combat the surging issue of environment pollution.
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both these views a 61
- Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?Give reasons for your answer using your own ideas and experience.Write at least 250 words. 78
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- There are more cars on the roads these days and more accidents. As a result, some politicians have suggested that people should take regular driving tests throughout their lives, rather than one single test. What do you think are the advantages of repeat 56
- Being a celebrity such as a famous film star or sports personality brings problems as well as benefits Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 537, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... on that day and if they breach the rule , they are penalised with 1000$ fine and ...
^^
Line 9, column 564, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$1000'.
Suggestion: $1000
...each the rule , they are penalised with 1000$ fine and a three month community servic...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 739, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... environment cannot be achieved by one. Hence the an enormous responsibility is on th...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 745, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'an' is left.
Suggestion: the; an
...onment cannot be achieved by one. Hence the an enormous responsibility is on the gover...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, nevertheless, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47349823322 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25858357135 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643109540636 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2578339216 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.642857143 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92857142857 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117696924619 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380428929431 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452874971397 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0627821063598 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0156355272718 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.