In the future, students may have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television of studying at traditional schools. What would you prefer?
Technology is increasingly playing a crucial part in the learning process of students around the global, resulting in a trend in which students choose to study at home by the utilization of technology. However, to my view, I still believe that only traditional schools can provide the best learning environment for children and youngsters.
To commence with, it is scientifically proven that direct human interaction can lead to a higher positive education outcome. Students will definitely have a deeper understanding about the subjects when they have to focus more on the lecture. The presence of the teacher and all the disciplines in the class makes it impossible for students to be easily distracted and do something else, which is totally in contrast with using the computer to study at home. Furthermore, students not only have a good command of knowledge but also are equipped with integral skills by means of direct communication which includes discussion with teachers and friends, debate, doing presentation, and team work. This will provide every students with chances to learn actively, express themselves and compete with their peers, which undoubtedly makes them more eager to learn and achieve the best results.
In addition to that, conventional schools undeniably play the most pivotal part in the comprehensive development of children and adolescents. Initially, physical activities consisting of both formal physical education lessons and extra- curricular activities are a guarantee for a healthy young generation of the country. Reasonable timetable at schools will reduce the stress, pressure from academic learning and the possibility of suffering from diseases of students thanks to physical movements. Moreover, personality development of students is only promoted by the thorough guide of teachers. It is critically vital for students to learn to become a good citizen with standardized morality before they acquire knowledge and skills. Teachers will be the ones who instill in students positive social ethics, teach them to avoid social evils and lead them to the right path.
Last but not least, traditional school is an ideal environment to develop students’ talent. By means of a lot of extra-curricular activities along with academic competitions, students will find it easier for them to find out their hidden potential which can not be awaken by the technology. Besides, it is the teachers who will inspire students, motivate them, give them the motives to achieve incredible feats. This is highly likely make students feel empowered and more motivated to study and pursue their dreams.
To sum up, I wholeheartedly believe that only going to schools, can students receive the best education.
- Nowadays celebrities are mainly famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements, and this sets a bad example to young people. To what extent do you agree and disagree 84
- Computers are increasingly used in education. In what areas are computers more important than teachers. And in what areas are teachers more important than computers. 73
- All the world is made of faith and trust and pixie dust Peter Pan However many people think that hope and faith are just illusory What do faith and trust mean to you 67
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed. What is the reason for doing this? Is this a negative or positive development? 84
- Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 878, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... evils and lead them to the right path. Last but not least, traditional school i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, in addition, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2322.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 426.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45070422535 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01589845669 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537558685446 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7695879606 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167310211293 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544803884763 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615295606978 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0997735418205 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461087753847 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.