Children in many countries are eating more fast food and convenience snacks. Why are children doing this and how serious are the consequences?
The problem of children in many countries are eating more fast and convenience snacks which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is hazardous. while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked controversial over the potential recent years. In my opinion former proposition appears to more rational. This essay will further elaborate negtive effect of trend thus will lead to logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this arguments but the most prepoderant one stems from the fact that when children much eat fast food then,it is main ramification their health. so everyone say that health is wealth. Much eat fast food destroy their body structure, which is main effect their personlity. For instance, when children eating more fast food, and their spoiled their face like, grow some pimples and skin problems. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
Steps to deal with this problem are many but the most significant ones are not complicated but accessible and practical. Moreover,fast food generally taste is good but can increase cholesterol turns puts a bad effect of functioning of the heart.
According to arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the problem of increasing heart and skin diseases day by day can be successfully addresses provided that the above stead measures are taken.
- There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phones. 77
- increasing poverty rate 85
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education agree or disagree Or Experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books Agree or disagree 76
- more information available online 77
- kind of friend 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...y people claiming that it is hazardous. while others reject this notion. The substant...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y people claiming that it is hazardous. while others reject this notion. The substant...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...d of reasons which will further explain this arguments but the most prepoderant one ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...at when children much eat fast food then,it is main ramification their health. so e...
^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...n,it is main ramification their health. so everyone say that health is wealth. Muc...
^^
Line 9, column 130, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , fast
...d but accessible and practical. Moreover,fast food generally taste is good but can in...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 122, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'diseases'' or 'disease's'?
Suggestion: diseases'; disease's
...he problem of increasing heart and skin diseases day by day can be successfully addresse...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, so, then, thus, while, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 233.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31759656652 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74412425154 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618025751073 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 379.143842365 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.1696987861 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3076923077 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9230769231 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308493920161 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963704739212 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869468503751 0.071462118173 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15146638823 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10706064032 0.0609392437508 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.