design of building will have a positive impact.
The importance of design of building will have a positive impact on people’s life which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but one of the most preponderant one stems from the fact that the design of building will have a much more benefits for people’s life and work. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that building they have some more different benefits for people’s. Needless to say, these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that the design of building will have a positive impact on people’s life and work. Besides, building design is large burn and they can people’s satisfied of their life. Hence, it is apparent why many are against of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of design of building will have a positive impact on people’s life are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-11 | SATHISH KUMAR B | 55 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Vindictassas | view | |
| 2021-03-07 | honorrr | 88 | view |
| 2021-01-04 | sajeevan | 55 | view |
| 2020-07-03 | ninilw | 55 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1232.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13333333333 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84348365664 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 139.433497537 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495833333333 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 381.6 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9610648207 50.4703680194 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436674430285 0.242375264174 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177471691375 0.0925447433944 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153116276154 0.071462118173 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.33007871444 0.151781067708 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653752931983 0.0609392437508 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.