A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position
Learning must be a fun process. Due to the increase in technological growth, the present generation students prefer practical knowledge to boring long lectures from pedagogues. The prompt suggests that there must be a common curriculum for the entire nation. I strongly disagree to the above suggestion for the following reasons.
To begin, unemployment has become a serious issue in modern times. According to a survey, one of the main reasons is due to lack of pragmatic knowledge. Many schools and colleges spend too much time on the theoretical information leaving little time for practicing and applying the concepts the individual has learnt. For example, if there were a problem regarding a household appliance, knowing the reason for its malfunction isn’t going to help one. A particular set of skill is required to fix it which is not acquired by long tedious lessons.
Secondly, the students should have a right to express their interest. They should be allowed to be creative and should be able to experiment regardless of the outcome. Confining them to the one schedule does not allow them to think out of the box. They should be allowed to choose subjects depending on their interests. For instance, if a student who aspired to become a horse trainer was forced to take computer lessons instead of learning programming, they might be staring at the horse wallpaper in their computer screen all day.
Thirdly, there is rise in mental health issues in the past few years such as anxiety and social awkwardness. The modern curricula primarily focus on forcing students into studying. It is designed with a surfeit of presentations, surprise tests and online exams which play a crucial role in their final grade. Many of these exams are often unannounced and therefore creating impact on the student’s mental health. Students if allowed to design their own curricula based on their goals, these issues can be curbed to certain extent.
In conclusion, by allowing them to choose subjects according to their own will students will be far more benefited. Students will tend to be more creative and studying would be fun.
- An ancient, traditional remedy for insomnia—the scent of lavender flowers—has now been proved effective. In a recent study, 30 volunteers with chronic insomnia slept each night for three weeks on lavender-scented pillows in a controlled room where the 50
- In the age of television reading books is not as important as it once was People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books 55
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 58
- The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006 67
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to program', 'to programme'.
Suggestion: to program; to programme
...ke computer lessons instead of learning programming, they might be staring at the horse wal...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 439, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'designing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: designing
...os;s mental health. Students if allowed to design their own curricula based on their goal...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 352.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10227272727 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79698861963 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7259318313 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5238095238 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7619047619 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7619047619 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156212417091 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043758144028 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330847203018 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788020825599 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221010850508 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.