In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In this contemporary world, new researches and studies are taking place everyday and the technologies are advancing as we speak of it. The claim prompts that in any field, often a novice is more likely to come up with a vital contribution than an expert. I disagree with this claim and feel that even though beginners have unorthodox thinking, and often come up with unique ideas, it is almost always under the supervision of an expert and they are the ones that help in refining the idea.
Firstly, Experts are called so because of a reason -- they are the people who have undergone rigorous years of study and research in their respective fields and are well acquianted with their subject of interest. The extensive research provides these experts with experience and knowledge, which is very important when it comes to understanding the intricacies of a topic. For instance, the highly renowned chemist Madam Curie, was herself a chemistry professor who had been researching for many years in her field before making a breakthrough discovery -- 'discovering radioactivity in elements'. As you gain experience, you become more comfortable with understanding abstruse topics, which further helps in making important contributions.
Admittedly, it can be argued that, often tyros are the ones to come up with revolutionary ideas due to their heterodox thinking. But it is forgotten that, these ideas often are formulate and nurtured under the supervision of an expert. The expert is the one who provides the right techniques and methods to go about solving a difficult problem. Also, the beginners get to learn a lot under the experts about the subject. Consider an example where we have a student who is not well acquainted with physics and he has no one to guide him. Without proper guidance, how can we expect him to understand highly convoluted topics like the 'String theory' and work on them to make new discoveries. Experts are the foundation for the formation of critical thinking in a student, which may later help the student to make important advancements in the subject.
Therefore, eventhough it is argued that novices are the ones that come up with important contributions due to their radical thinking and enthusiasm and eagerness to learn about the subject. More often than not, it is because of the efforts and guidance of an expert that a inchoate idea turns into a full grown revolutionary idea. Therefore, it is safe to say that experts are often the ones that are more likely to make important contributions in their field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-20 | mandius123 | 50 | view |
- Government funding for purely scientific endeavors, such as space exploration, should be reduced in order to direct more funding toward humanitarian science projects.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the 75
- Schools should cut funding for extracurricular activities such as sports and the arts when school buildings are in need of repair.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this recommendation and explain your rea 66
- A recent study by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention found that employees with paid sick leave are 28 percent less likely to be involved in a work-related accident than employees who do not receive payment for sick leave. Researchers hypothesiz 63
- If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posi 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...researches and studies are taking place everyday and the technologies are advancing as w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ching for many years in her field before making a breakthrough discovery -- disco...
^^
Line 3, column 638, Rule ID: COMFORTABLE_WITH_VBG[1]
Message: Use simply 'comfortable understanding'.
Suggestion: comfortable understanding
...As you gain experience, you become more comfortable with understanding abstruse topics, which further helps in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put between 'are' and 'formulate'.
Suggestion: are often formulate
.... But it is forgotten that, these ideas often are formulate and nurtured under the supervision of a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'formulated'.
Suggestion: formulated
...s forgotten that, these ideas often are formulate and nurtured under the supervision of a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 505, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... who is not well acquainted with physics and he has no one to guide him. Without ...
^^
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... efforts and guidance of an expert that a inchoate idea turns into a full grown r...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2122.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01654846336 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86301411575 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508274231678 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.465292158 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.823529412 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8823529412 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253180410289 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084128599435 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765996929828 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156145604621 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582324469952 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.