Recycling our waste is a big issue today. A lot of people feel that others are not recycling enough and that the government should make it a legal requirement. In your opinion, should laws be needed to ensure that people recycle their waste?
The influence of recycling which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The significant influence of people feelings about other recycling more than others has sparked the impact of this trend on legal requirements in recent years. It can be agreed that it is a huge issue today. Therefore, this essay will elaborate my opinion and also shows why government should make legal requirement and how we could ensure people to recycle more and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why government should apply fines or even investing in publishments to show to people all benefits of recycling, but the most conspicuous one steams from the fact that it has been tought at schools and we should listen our kids. As an illustration, a University of Adelaide study has shown that since year 1 at primary school children are able to understand and recycling correctly their waste. However, many of those cases their parents do not listening them and at the end have the mistake of chose the wrong rubish bin or just do not care about reclycling.
Nevertheless, I believe that remain some drawbacks that might overwhelm the significant influence of recycling, but the most alarming one is rooted from the fact that parents should participate and also to be part of this new generation. For instance, as long as parents are recycling they will be a example for youngers keep doing the same. Hence, government will not be require to take major decisions making laws for this.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the influence of recycling is a crucial fact, and think about the environment should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-04 | daniellima126 | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | vandana2715 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | daniellima126 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | nicah | 55 | view |
| 2019-06-09 | nalaikgenious | 61 | view |
- Many people like nurse and teachers should get more pay, especially in recent years, people in finance, film actors and company leaders are getting more pay. What's your opinion? 77
- Are the cars damaging the environment Should the number of cars bought be to one per family Discuss the problem and provide a solution 77
- Around the world solar energy is becoming a more popular source of energy for many households Why do you think this is so What are the advantages and disadvantages of using solar energy to power one s home 80
- Who is responsible for Climate change, whether Government or industries? 77
- Some people think law changes human behavior. Do you agree or disagree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...g as parents are recycling they will be a example for youngers keep doing the sam...
^
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'taking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: taking
.... Hence, government will not be require to take major decisions making laws for this. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94755244755 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74718613124 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594405594406 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.7026255423 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.636363636 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332449180379 0.242375264174 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119593971483 0.0925447433944 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664073393246 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189563026994 0.151781067708 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886012366188 0.0609392437508 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.1260098522 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.