Many people believe that university students should study a full range of subjects, instead of some specific subjects.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint?
University studies have been causing hot disputes between people since their creation at the very beginning. According to existing opinion, students should be provided with variety of skills and different fields' knowledge in their schedule. Although I agree that studying different subjects can make a person erudite, it should not be obligatory for students.
On the one hand, youngers usually do not aware of what they will do in the future, therefore they have to participate in every job or studies area. That is why high education possesses all tools and should help yesterday's school students. For instance, around 40% graduates in Russia work in a business differed from their specialization. In other words, those individuals, who do not feel satisfied with their major, have the opportunity to find attracting field during additional classes at university.
On the other hand, if a learner chose a future occupation, suggesting new unnecessary subjects disturbs from main courses and make them anxious and disappointed. Students are associated with lack of sleep and money because they generally have to attend many lectures and seminars, instead of working part time and applying new information in practice. For example, according to a recent survey in Russia, only 25% of students have tried to work in their studies’ related sphere. Thus, only some of the graduates will be able to start working right after finishing degree as their do not obtain a crucial practice experience.
Overall, taking everything into consideration it can be concluded that despite positive features that wide study program has, careful choice of subjects can save students some time for other activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-27 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-17 | Qudrat2003 | 56 | view |
| 2020-03-22 | Shuklaksh | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-22 | Shuklaksh | 84 | view |
| 2020-02-16 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 67 | view |
- Do you agree that the nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes?Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.Give reasons for your viewpoint. 78
- Write about the following topic Road accidents are more frequent these days and claim many lives each year As a result some people suggest that drivers should take regular driving tests throughout their lives rather than one single driving test to improve 89
- People today know fewer of their neighbors than in the past Why is this What can be done to solve this problem 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People are never satisfied with what they have they always want something more or something different Use specific reasons to support your answer 70
- Sometimes spouses have to live far away from each other Maintaining a long distance relationship is sometimes difficult and straining What do you think are the main reasons for long distance relationships What can be done to help couples feel closer 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...ctures and seminars, instead of working part time and applying new information in practic...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 491, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...eir studies’ related sphere. Thus, only some of the graduates will be able to start working...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37686567164 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81040010343 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652985074627 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2894502808 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.083333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212456786966 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710228197819 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393889837449 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126053531676 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035199051212 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.