The line graph shows the percentage of different age groups of cinema visitors in a particular country from 1978 to 2008.
The line chart indicates the proportion of four different age groups of cinema visitors in a particular nations over a three decade period starting in 1978.
Overall, it can be seen that the percentage of individuals in 14-24, 25-34 and 35-49 age groups who visited cinema increased, whereas visitors of cinema by masses in 50 above older age group decreased over the period shown.
Looking at the chart in more detail, it can be seen that the visitors of cinema by people on 14-24 younger age group stood at only 90% at the beginning of the period. This number declined consistently to 75% in 1988, after this line go up to approximately 90% in 1998, By 2008 it had dropped steadily to 80%. However, cinema visitors by individuals in 25-34 and 35-49 age groups were fell rapidly from 80% and 60% in 1978 to 68% and 50% in 2008 respectively.
Turning to remaining in to data set, it is evident that the 40% of people who visited cinema by 50+ older age group in 1978. This number declined briefly to only 20% in 1988 which was the lowest point on the chart, and after this data rose exponentially to just 50% at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-27 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-27 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
| 2020-03-12 | jerry patel | view | |
| 2023-01-27 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-27 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
- Some people prefer to live in rented homes Advantages and disadvantages essay 84
- The chart below shows the main methods of transportation for people traveling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009
- Some people believe that charity organization should help people wherever they live other think that should attend their countries only Discuss both views 36
- Some say that school education is useless others say that it is important Discuss both views 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports Center now, and how it will look after development. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, however, if, look, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55555555556 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48818065358 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51690821256 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.8628000113 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.714285714 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5714285714 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335477541069 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165097999725 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10906088234 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222833660497 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889523786973 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.76 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.