Most people do not care enough about environmental issues. To what extent to do agree or disagree with this statement?
Environmental degradation is a growing concern in both developed and developing world, posing a threat to national economy and development. However, tt is argued that environment-related issues are not given much thought as it deserves. While I support this statement, I believe that the world is making an attempt not to deteriorate the natural habitat.
The first reason is that environmental issues are having little impact on individual life at the moment, but the wildlife and future generation. For example, deforestation, which is mostly caused by human activities, not only leads to wild animal’s habitat destruction currently, but residential damage as well. However, only when natural calamities such as flooding takes place is the need to preserve the forest considered. In terms of future generation, they will be a victim of natural resources depletion if we continuously make use of these resources with lack of awareness. Another reason is that people fail to see how serious damage is global warming exerts on the environment. As a result, most industrial zones and individuals are turning a blind eye to the problem by not reducing their carbon footprint, which is exacerbating the environment.
Despite those arguments, I strongly believe that a plethora of efforts have been made to alleviate environmental problems. Renewable energy is more and more universally consumed than it used to be to produce mostly electricity, reducing the reliance on fossil fuels, which are one of the contributors to pollution. Individuals are also raising their self-awareness by using biodegradable packaging and other environmentally friendly products.
In conclusion, although the impact of environment-related issues is underestimated due to lack of awareness, much effort are put in environmental protection.
- The Graph shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- The maps below show the changes in a town in Europe after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam Describe the noticeable changes in the maps 81
- The chart shows air pollution levels by different causes among four countries in 2021 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 92
- The graph shows oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 84
- The diagram below shows how photographs can be produced using digital photographic equipment 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 491, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...ation, they will be a victim of natural resources depletion if we continuously make use o...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57761732852 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4612825286 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631768953069 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1112108081 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.846153846 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135118006877 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435452826418 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0221169412778 0.0667982634062 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0747417242693 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172865234978 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.