These days some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Spending lavishly on entry requirements of sporting and cultural events has always been a moot issue since few decades. A segment of society considers it a positive turn while others are most suspicious about its repercussions. To my mind, layong out for buying ticket of games and social events is a wise idea for several reasons, elucidated in the ensuing fragments.
First and foremost benefit of indulging in live sports are cultural programs is that it breaks the monotony of life. To be more precise, as everyone, these days, has very hectic schedule followed by work to home only. In this case, going out to watch one's favourite event infuses energy and enthusiasm among them. As such, money spent on ticket in order to be refreshed, relaxed, rejuvenated and revitalized is never worthless. As per world health organisation, for instance, people in touch with sports and traditional activities show much more tendency to perform better at work than those of them who do not involve in such activities.
Likewise, buying tickets is a win and win situation for the spectators and management of particular event. By this I mean, when people spend for entry authorisation they remain in touch with sports and traditional value is which also pervade oodles of confidence among players. What is more, management invest this money to maintain and manage that event on regular basis. Hence, ticket charges is always commendable in order to get into grounds as spectators.
However, some people advocate that expending on tickets is mere a wastage of money and time. As one can enjoy same at home on television. Nevertheless, watching at screen can never be compared to the live events. Where individuals get vast knowledge which widens their perspective and broadens their horizon.
To recapitulate, I vehemently vouch that it is worth to pay on buying sports and cultural passes in terms of getting knowledge, feeling rebooted, keeping in touch with social activities and so on.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-30 | heyimmehak@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | heyimmehak@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | heyimmehak@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2020-03-10 | Yoyo1234 | 92 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | marukap | 91 | view |
- most people accept that we live in a globalised world but not everyone agrees that is this is beneficial to what extent is globalisation of positive or negative development 84
- Some people think that higher salary is important when choosing a company to work for while others think that good atmosphere at a workplace is more important Discuss both view points and give your own opinion 50
- Because of the busy pace of modern life many children spend most of their time indoors and have little exposure to the natural world How important is it for children to learn to understand and appreciate nature 67
- Nowadays many countries have very cosmopolitan cities with people from all over the world How can the government ensure that all these people can live together harmoniously 85
- The growth of online shopping will one day lead to all shops in towns and cities closing Do you agree or disagree 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 93, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ts is mere a wastage of money and time. As one can enjoy same at home on televisio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for instance, i mean, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08282208589 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79234967028 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61963190184 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2328185881 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4705882353 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252362354606 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670008539264 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477587463097 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117716482721 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455791923898 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.