Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is recognized that to road will be safer if we increase the minimum legal age for driving vehicles. I agree with that argument and the reason is written in this essay.
Sometimes people think that the solution of the problem is to act conservatively and I totally agree with them. Instead of using police in increasing road safety we tackle the problem at its roots. It means we must increase the minimum legal age for driving. Firstly, adolescent and youth people not fully understand the responsibility of driving. In my point of view, the drivers must have family, especially children. The person who has a child will be more mature in some cases of driving. Some universities have made a research on that case and concluded that road accident mostly made by youth and adolescent people. Whereas, only a little amount of accident is involved by individuals who are mostly parents.
The second reason is, mostly youth or adolescent people are mostly acting emotionally not logically. It might cause massive problems on the road, starting with driving on high-speed ending with demonstratively shows like getting head out of the window or sitting on the hood of the moving car. Although, by using a car you could easily reach your school or college but nowadays you can easily offer a taxi.
In conclusion, If we seriously think about safety on the road, we must take more responsibility and act logically. I totally agree to increase the minimum legal age for drive a car, so I can be in patience and assurance, that there are no adolescent people who could act emotionally and with non-responsibility.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | emzin | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | UYNDNG | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | UYNDNG | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | hieu13092006 | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | Charles Le | 73 | view |
- In the modern world people no longer need to use food or products from animals such as medicine and clothing Do you agree or disagree with that statement 84
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 66
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 73
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 73
- The Pie chart gives information about the country of birth of people living in Australia and the table shows where people born in these countries live 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...of driving. Some universities have made a research on that case and concluded that road ac...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 623, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ly made by youth and adolescent people. Whereas, only a little amount of accident is in...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, so, whereas, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89416058394 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85632152364 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525547445255 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2734006676 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288563547576 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092707466329 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828183484976 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194642664673 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566306736552 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.