The graph below gives information on the performance of a train company in October and November in 2008.
The two-line graphs illustrate the percentage of trains, from a particular company, that were either cancelled or running late in October and November in 2008.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that the proportion of train trips that were delayed and cancelled both witnessed fluctuations strong over the period shown. Additionally, the highest rate of the trains cancelled happened in 2nd week of October, while the figure for late trains also in the 2nd week of November.
In the first week of October, about 20% of all trains did not run on time. The figure rose slightly during the next week before dropping to around 5% in the last week of October. In contrast, when came November, more half of all trains ran late more than the schedule in the second week in November, followed by a mild fall to 40% in the third week.
Only 1% of train tours was not operated in the first week. However, the percentage of trains that were cancelled reached a peak of 7% in the second week but later dipped back to the initial figure. After that, there was a significant oscillation in the rest of the period, with about 4% of all trains being cancelled in the final week.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-15 | quynhtran8 | 80 | view |
| 2020-10-20 | denistran85 | 78 | view |
| 2020-03-15 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 74 | view |
- The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010 Figures are in millions of dollars 78
- The chart below shows Japan s population by age groups starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 89
- The table below compares actual and predicted figures for populations in three di erent cites 78
- The chart below shows a comparison of di erent kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 78
- The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64593301435 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48572767203 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55980861244 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3562394068 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.888888889 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134916778522 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636525015958 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482352409664 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993312385391 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540977224141 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.