Networking of public transportation available for eveyone
The importance of networking of public transportation available for everyone which was always debatable has now become more controversial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years reject this notion. In my opinion, the former preposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact is that as cities expending some people claim governments should look forward creating better networking of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owing pollution. Consequently, government prepare the roads for all the worlds because easily to travels. Another pivotal aspect of this trend government provides the networking of public transportation available for everyone. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that governments take the action for pollution because pollution increases the day by day so harmful for all individuals. Besides, government control the vehicles because increase the pollution. Hence, it is why apparent why many are in favor of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of networking of public transportation available for everyone are indeed too great to ignore.
- Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Write its pros and cons? 77
- different types of music 77
- In some countries around the world voting is compulsory. do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? 55
- environmental problem 77
- Positive And Negative Effects Of Technology Information Through Mass Media 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, look, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58634538153 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99142066638 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578313253012 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.2602024906 50.4703680194 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.916666667 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340427080554 0.242375264174 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12776358289 0.0925447433944 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150699131718 0.071462118173 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229085523009 0.151781067708 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117450980506 0.0609392437508 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.