we have entered a throwaway society and fill the environment with rubbish.
It has long been a subject of discussion whether we have entered a throwaway society and fill the environment with rubbish or not. In my opinion, the former notion has several It elements that deserve attention and I will explain why using many pertinent arguments.
There are myriad of arguments in favor of my context, and the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that people should be extra careful with their decision. For example, according to a recent survey done by Stanford University, 45% people benefit from the above mentioned notion, whereas 30% people face disadvantages due to it. Hence, it is apparent why many citizens are in favor of the above stance.
Another argument in support of my view is that governments worldwide have become more active in dealing with this situation. To illustrate, as per recent academic research carried out by the Australian government 60% citizens gained immensely from the proposed government reforms. They improved their existing scenario tremendously and the paved that way for a better economic future. Therefore, not only will this make people more careful and pragmatic in their approach, but also it will lead to a living standard.
From what has been discussed above, it is clear that the benefits to the given topic significantly outweigh the drawbacks. Lastly, in my opinion, it would be wise to say we have entered a throwaway society and fill the environment with rubbish.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-12 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2020-07-18 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Jasmaansingh1996 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | engr.sajjad55@gmail.com | 85 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
- Fresh water resources diminish in large cities in the world each year, what are the cause of this crucial problem? What are the solutions? 85
- sports and movies 77
- current problems facing society deserve high priority for funding rather than research for likely future issues 80
- government should reduce their investment 72
- same food 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, lastly, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1210.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10548523207 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74565881194 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620253164557 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.4931525404 50.4703680194 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.0 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312612040239 0.242375264174 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129265170963 0.0925447433944 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.243632547822 0.071462118173 341% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231694335336 0.151781067708 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.199528688593 0.0609392437508 327% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.