It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that governments should focus on their citizens instead of supporting citizens from other countries. While it is true that the governments need to help their people, I would argue that providing support for others around the world is also possible.
To begin with, there are several reasons why governments should help people in their countries. Firstly, every countries have their own issues such as poverty in undeveloped countries or population aging in developed countries. Therefore, focusing on citizens and problems should be every countries’ top priority. Secondly, supporting residents from their own nation will contribute to the development of the country. For example, when residents are provided with better education, they will have chances to get great jobs with high paychecks. This will help increase the GDP of the whole country.
However, I believe that we can also support individuals coming from other parts of the world. First, in some countries, especially undeveloped countries, there are people having intense troubles such as infectious diseases or starvation. They and their countries are struggling to deal with these problems. As a result, it is necessary for prosperous countries to support the poor ones. Additionally, the support creates a remarkable image towards international citizens and might greatly benefit both countries. For instance, the help results in a positive relationship between two nations and might pave a way for removing trade barriers or increasing trading.
In conclusion, while it is obvious that the authorities should focus on their residents, I strongly believe that it is also possible to help people around the world.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-02-18 | lehonganh1212 | 78 | view |
2023-02-18 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
2023-02-18 | lehonganh1212 | 61 | view |
2023-02-18 | lehonganh1212 | 61 | view |
2023-02-17 | M_TPhan | 84 | view |
- More big shopping malls are being built and they replace small shops Is this a positive or negative development 56
- It is impossible to help all people in the world so governments should only focus on people in their own countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Nowadays more and more people want to travel to remote areas such as the South Pole Do the advantages of this type of travel outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them Education and job training are better ways to help them Do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53435114504 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87885458838 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557251908397 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6105467632 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4666666667 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249429209339 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916339231418 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765337035403 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182606544782 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568405375305 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.