We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer-based technology.
How do you think it will change in the future?
Is it good for us to rely so much on computers?
Technology is one of the main subject in modern life. Although it makes people live uncomplicated, some people argue that the requirement to computer-based technology is soared. I believe that people will use their high tech, in near future, more than today; however becoming too depended on technology might bring negative consequences to people livestyle.
Today, roughly every industry run with technologies such as computers, software programs. In the past, when people had not computer or just calculators, people have had spent a dramatically much time in their workplace or study than now. Since, Artificial Intelligence (AI) have developed, many people changed their lifestyle toward computers, reducing their efforts in a workplace or just study. Now scientists are creating new version of smartphones, computer platforms, even smart buildings. So, anyone agreed to using technology in order to change their lifestyle.
On the other hand, while people depended on technology, it can cause health problems. Firstly, while working with electronic gadgets people spend much more time with their computers or notebooks , risking their eyes. The ultra violet ray, for example, releasing from monitor decrease humans seeing quality. The much time they spent in devices the more they become tend to hurt their central vision. Moreover, people might have disease with their vertebrae, sitting in chair. Scientist proved that when you sit in chair main load take individuals vertebrae. So, while people dealing with their work or study with computers, there is a risk in their heath.
To sum up, technology is the significant invention of scientists that reduce our effort to fulfil our responsibilities; furthermore people use them in their further life more than today. However, although electronic devices help to human beings, they might cause health problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-16 | Chương nè nha | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-09 | nttn24905_vkdekutsuki | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-09 | nttn24905_vkdekutsuki | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | ndt2709 | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | ndt2709 | 67 | view |
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 84
- Children nowadays watch significantly more television than in the past, which reduces their activity levels accordingly. Why is this the case?What measures can you suggest to encourage higher levels of activity among children? 61
- Leaders and directors in an organisation are normally older people. Some people think younger leaders would be better. Do you agree or disagree. 56
- Children nowadays watch significantly more television than in the past, which reduces their activity levels accordingly. Why is this the case?What measures can you suggest to encourage higher levels of activity among children? 61
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ings, they might cause health problems.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, i think, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54411764706 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77723226093 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643382352941 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7721627432 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7777777778 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1111111111 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141090844971 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463439499095 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386513984368 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885178313552 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457585581789 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.26 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.