It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
In recent years, the question of whether technology and cultures are compatible has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although the popularity of technology appears disadvantageous for cultures, its upsides would justify these.
There are several reasons why individuals think that traditional cultures will be lost because of technology. First, since life is moving fast nowadays, human beings are busy with technologies. In fact, a substantial volume of work could be navigated due to the assist of technologies, which makes people forget about protecting and preserving traditions. Second, there are a whole host of attractive platforms and information on the Internet, people could be addicted to high-tech gadgets. For instance, an increasing number of youngsters tend to spend hours surfing social media such as Facebook or Instagram, which implies that cultures may be forgotten.
Nevertheless, the development of technologies seems to benefit the preservation of cultures. First, by using the Internet, information about traditions is spread widely in a short time. This means that campaigns about protecting traditional heritages and historical sites would come to a huge number of people via televisions or social platforms, which helps to bring cultural identities of a nation closer to citizens. Also, with appealing effects, images and sounds, the introduction of cultures, of minorities particularly, is more straightforward to citizens and foreigners. This means that the explosion of technology would trigger people's curiosity and galvanize them to travel to those places, which also generates a great deal of tourism.
In conclusion, the popularity of technologies supposes to bring further benefits. By using this tool, traditional cultures may be well-preserved and even flourished.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-07 | dorae | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | dorae | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-26 | thuyan1211 | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-09 | tranvuongphuongmy | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | Emma1998 | 84 | view |
- The three pie charts below show how the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by 3 companies over the period of 15 years 73
- The graph below shows the changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 77
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 78
- More and more companies are allowing employees to work from home DO you think this is a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In recent years, the question of whether technology and cultures are compatible ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 382, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...g traditions. Second, there are a whole host of attractive platforms and information...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74444444444 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23123685798 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622222222222 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7947760497 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.785714286 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284332867294 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930000122779 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645717986239 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172534722324 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036485421732 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.