People living in large cities face several problems.
What are these problems?
Should governments encourage people to move to smaller town?
It is true that city dwellers have to deal with many challenges during their daily life. This essay will state a number of these obstacles, which may be resolved when the authority motivates citizens to settle down in smaller regions.
To begin with, there are two major discernible problems puzzling residents in the city. Firstly, it is widely recognized that urban areas have been overpopulated, and this results in a significant number of private vehicles. Consequently, not only does this dense traffic flow exert pressure on transportation infrastructure but also contaminate an excessive load of exhausted gases, which contribute to air pollution and, in return, make people prone to diseases like COPD or lung cancer. Secondly, residents’ living is inevitably accompanied by the demand of education and healthcare. However, while their command is infinite, the resources are limited. Therefore, the more social members live in metropolitans, the less likely the authority is believed to entirely satisfy citizens’ basic needs.
In my opinion, it is favorable for the government to adopt a policy prompting people to migrate to minor places. Indeed, if fewer citizens live in large urban areas, this will obviously reduce the burden on local infrastructure and public service, which is believed to act as a catalyst for a higher life quality. For example, researchers have predicted that when 20% of the population in New York moves to satellite cities, the authority can provide the remainders with sufficient public schools and transportation. In fact, smaller towns, with fewer job opportunities and advanced facilities, compared to metropolitans, may not be engaging enough and unable to stimulate people. However, the government can narrow the gap between two regions by prioritizing its budget on constructing infrastructure, as well as support enterprises to launch their business in remote area.
Briefly, challenges posed by their life can be effectively tackled if city dwellers are recommended to live in smaller towns.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-14 | minh HUP | 89 | view |
| 2018-01-18 | lanaphuong | 69 | view |
- The pie charts below show the main regions that received exports from 3 Latin America countries in 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 89
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there is computer technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In today s world private companies rather than government pay for and conduct most scientific research Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 95
- Many people are travelling to other countries Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...zens to settle down in smaller regions. To begin with, there are two major disce...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e recommended to live in smaller towns.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in fact, as well as, in my opinion, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49683544304 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11808118875 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642405063291 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0385400883 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.071428571 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4285714286 7.06120827912 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146420169669 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428490696265 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304383974686 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0827421007547 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129888918992 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.