The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph gives information about the consumption of fish and some distinct kinds of meat in a nation in Europe in the 1979-2004 period.
Overall, it is clear that people in the European country consumed fish at least. Besides, while the amount of chicken increased steadily from 1979 to 2004, those of the remaining groups significantly dropped down.
At the starting point in 1979, the figures for the fish and the chicken were lowest, at only 60 and 140 grams per person on a weekly basis, respectively. However, people who settled down in this European nation witnessed a dramatically increasing trend of the consumption of fish to nearly 250 in 2004, whereas the figure for the fish slightly decreased to below 50 at the same time.
Additionally, in the European nation, the amount of beef that a person ate was approximately 220 grams weekly, which was higher than that of the lamb, at only precisely 150. Although there were many fluctuations in the 1979-2004 period, the amount of consumed beef and lamp had decreasing trends to nearly 100 and 60 grams per person per week in 2004, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-05 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2024-05-05 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | baoquyen1906 | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-27 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-27 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows the process of making soft cheese Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 53
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree about this opinion 70
- Many foods are shipped from far away Some people think that eating local food is better environmentally and economically Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 84
- The charts show the percentage of peple working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 78
- The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, whereas, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89417989418 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73895265567 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.7884524895 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.142857143 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20130075441 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105020306024 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881818963125 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148626578684 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924978729922 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.