It is inevitale that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view?
In modern life, technology has developed rapidly which may have a clear impact on the disappearance of traditional cultures. Thus, some point of view considers that there is a mismatch between technology and traditional cultures. However, opposite to that view, I believe the potential links between the two of them still exist.
First of all, by using technology devices, traditional cultures have become more well-known and closer to people than ever before. For instance, we just only stay at home and type on the Internet searching box, a list of headlines, images, or videos relating to cultural keywords will appeared within a second. Individuals or groups, who want to promote their nation, traditional music, cuisine, or people living there, can use many applies on from the Internet source such as Youtube, Instagram to introduce to friends in the country as well as overseas. Therefore, technology is as a supporting device for the culture's development.
Moreover, recently, technology has played an essential role in cultural preservation. Several tribes who live in the Amazon rain forest has been discovered, however, they are on the edge of extinction. On this occasion, many people from all over the world who have one voice to save their lives have been connected together by media transportation. In addition, not only save lives, we need to protect their success. In some cases, the high-tech program is required to record the traditional song and save it as data, just as an example. The technology provides useful tools to preserve cultures.
The enhancement of technology leading to the missing of traditional cultures because those are incompatible. In my perspective, I advocate the idea that those are linked together, technology will support and supply equipment to protect traditional cultures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-25 | Tran Bao Long | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-04 | Alonejourney | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-04 | Alonejourney | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-26 | lilyngan | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that it is the best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes 78
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations 78
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both view and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 285, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'appear'
Suggestion: appear
...deos relating to cultural keywords will appeared within a second. Individuals or groups,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 612, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cultures'' or 'culture's'?
Suggestion: cultures'; culture's
...ology is as a supporting device for the cultures development. Moreover, recently, techn...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32525951557 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95032974234 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608996539792 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5107313352 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.6 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1333333333 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284849313032 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100746764195 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741959357012 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181423257638 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494716982244 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.