It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view?
Some people believe that the technological developments will cancel the traditional cultures. In my opinion, I suppose traditional cultures are only affected a small part of some societies, others seem to be uninfluenced by technology.
On the one hand, the advances in technology have threatened the local cutures. Due to technology boom, people have many chances to approach the new different cultures from many parts of the country. The fast and strong cultural exchanges made people acquire the new ways of life quickly but lacking of the selection that led to the disappearance of the local cultures. For example, the citizens of ethnic minorities today are becoming hesitant to wear traditional costumes, sing and dance their own traditional music in their traditional festivals. Furthermore, the advances in technology that have driven urbanization have certainly contributed to the disappearance of the traditional houses such as Stift houses, or Nha Rong of Zarai and Bahnar people in the central highland and replaced by the concrete houses.
On the other hand, There is no denying that technology makes contribution to the maintenance and advancement of traditional cultures. Thanks to the development of digital devices, people can record all the traditional festivals which showed on the mass media to the people from all over the country who can approach them. Hence, the ancient way of lifes will live long in the memory of each citizen. For example, Vietnamese people who live abroad can’t enjoy directly Tet holiday every year, but they can feel the Tet atmosphere via live TV channel about the festival. Besides, people today can find out a lot of informations about all traditional cutures which they want to know are written in great detail on the internet.
In conclusion, many traditional ways of life have been lost as a result of the technological development, however others have maintained and developed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-25 | Tran Bao Long | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-04 | Alonejourney | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-04 | Alonejourney | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-26 | lilyngan | 89 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some think the current generation should take steps to protect the environment for the next generation To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 75
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (TV) must be used with a third-person verb: 'channels'.
Suggestion: channels
...can feel the Tet atmosphere via live TV channel about the festival. Besides, people tod...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26537216828 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97634005791 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559870550162 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0143077771 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.153846154 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0769230769 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237004283862 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936790594783 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604440676763 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163579608809 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609266671979 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.