The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem?
Over the past few years, the prevailing phenomenon of accelerating goods production for demanding human's consumption, which takes its toll on the environment. In spite of negative influences resulted from this trend, there are feasible measures to address this problem.
As a matter of fact, there are a few rationales to condemn the mass production exerting disastrous impacts on the environment. The first cause is that the upsurge of manufacturing industry could be considered as one of the primary culprits spurring the acceleration of consuming merchandises. In fact, all of these industries have a tendency to avail fossil fuel, which discharges a large influx of gas emission to the environment. Consequently, this is the main culprit of resulting in air contamination leading to detrimental implications for people's health condition, particularly wrecking their respiratory systems. Another fact is that the trend of raising up the population is prone to generate destructive ramifications on the environment. To facilitate human-living conditions, the producers have the attempt to boost the productivity to tackle the demand for the resident in terms of purchasing essential goods. Additionally, this will result in the problem of overconsumption of citizens leading to the matter of throwing away their product extravagantly, which are able to plunge the environment into being ruined.
As far as it is concerned, there are a multitude of efficient approaches to eradicate the aforementioned problems. The first method is to impose a higher tax on the manufacturing commodities. All of these products are lifted up the cost which is likely to be subject to the resident’s consideration in opting for a product. This may alleviate the total consumption of human and the number of goods produced in the sense that the adverse trend of spoiling the environment will be mitigated instantly. In other words, the governments or authorities can operate a plethora of campaigns to raise the public perception regarding dire corollaries resulted from the mass production. As a result, if this measure is set off, not only will the citizens perceive the detrimental effect of excessive production but also put an end to the environmental degradation.
In conclusion, as cited above, though the increasing production of merchandise will pose a multitude of threats to the environment, there are still plausible solutions to eliminate this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-08 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | quynhanhbuiviet | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | hieu13092006 | 61 | view |
- Today much of the food people eat gets transported from farms that are thousands of miles away Some people believe it would be better for the environment and the economy if people only consumed food produced by local farmers Would the advantages of this o 78
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 78
- Supermarkets should only sell food produced from within their own country rather than imports from overseas What are your opinions on this 50
- The given table shows the actual and projected population of Argentina Indonesia Italy and Republic of Korea for the years 2003 2025 and 2050 89
- The table below presents the number of children ever born to women aged 40 44 years in Australia for each year the information was collected since 1981 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...lerating goods production for demanding humans consumption, which takes its toll on th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, regarding, so, still, in conclusion, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, in other words, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2081.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47631578947 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37467655165 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565789473684 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3828968202 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0625 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26502998998 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774974216031 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675020593481 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16740616373 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151710160687 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.