(W1) Repenomamus robustus (R.robustus) was not an active hunter
The reading states that the Repenomanus robust (R. robustus) is the scavenger dinosaur and provides 3 reasons of support. The professor says that it does not the scavenger dinosaur but it is hunting dinosaur and refutes each of the author’s reason.
First, the reading claims that the size of R.robustus which similar size of a general cat is small, so it cannot be hunter. The professor refutes this point by saying that although the R.robustus is a small, it can still the predator dinosaur.
He explains that the R. robustus may not hunt the adult dinosaur or bigger than it, but it can eat a baby dinosaur.
Second, the article posits that legs are smaller than running to hunt, however, the professor states that thought the dinosaur is small, but it can run fast
According to the professor, he shows some example of fast dinosaur is Tasmanian Devil dinosaur that it is run very fast, however, it is small dinosaur.
Third, the reading says that the stomach of R. robustus do not have some bone of other dinosaur, so it should be scavenger dinosaur. The professor opposes this point by the R. Robust is the powerful jaw for swallowing eggs and small psittacosaur, so it must be hunter dinosaur.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-05 | thonsapon83 | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Your school has received a gift of money. what do you think is the best way for your school to spend this money? Use specific reasons to support your choice. 73
- W1 Repenomamus robustus R robustus was not an active hunter 66
- In the future, students may have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television or of studying at traditional schools. Which would you prefer? Use reason and specific details to explain your choice. 65
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Face to Face communication is better than other types of communication such as letters e mail or telephone calls Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stus which similar size of a general cat is small, so it cannot be hunter. The pr...
^^
Line 9, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of R. robustus do not have some bone of other dinosaur, so it should be scaveng...
^^
Line 9, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...robustus do not have some bone of other dinosaur, so it should be scavenger dino...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, second, so, still, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 30.3222958057 36% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 209.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7990430622 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55644818107 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 145.348785872 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488038277512 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 295.2 419.366225166 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 71.5378687596 49.2860985944 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5833333333 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4166666667 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117584937933 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567409322054 0.0996497079465 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623317936311 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0728512025113 0.162205337803 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617620952896 0.0443174109184 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 63.6247240618 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.