In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both sides and express your opinion.
Income inequality is common in every country. In some nations, companies are allowed to pay inordinate salaries for some positions. Pessimists claim that restrictions on the amount of money paid for employees are necessary while optimists, including myself, argue that this issue brings more benefits to a country.
Some people believe that limiting the earnings of highest-paid employees can reduce the dissatisfaction of lower-paid ones, who are the majority of the staff, and create more job opportunities in labor market. According to a study published in 2020, in regions where the income gap between the highest-paid group and the lowest-paid group is less than 10 times, the number of strikes for increase in salaries is 30 percent less than in places where there is no control of this. Moreover, inflated salaries for a minority of employees mean less capital spent on business expansion. Therefore, cutting them can allow companies to invest more in new branches or manufactories, thus creating more jobs.
Meanwhile, other people argue that by letting business owners decide the reasonable amount of money they pay for their employees, countries can expect a rise in the amount of income taxes and avoid brain drain. Because workers can be paid as much as what they deserve, they are more likely to serve their companies harder and more innovatively, raising the possibility to receive rewards for their better performance at the workplace. The more they earn, the more tax they can contribute to their countries. Furthermore, if governments try to restrict the maximum salary employees can receive, the most talented ones might have more reasons to immigrate to other countries, where there is no limit in their earnings. Hence, those countries can encounter the dearth of senior personnel in almost every area, such as banking and mathematics.
In conclusion, some people assert that more satisfaction among members of staff and more jobs can be gained when there is a wage ceiling regulated by the governments, while others are opposed to the regulation because it not only decreases expected amount of income taxes of countries but also makes them lose their most skillful workers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-23 | andrew.dang | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | lakhveer khokhar | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | lakhveer khokhar | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | lakhveer khokhar | 71 | view |
| 2021-09-02 | lakhveer khokhar | 56 | view |
- In some countries a few people earn extremely high salaries Some people think that this is good for a country while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn Discuss both sides and express your opinion 78
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in our everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 11
- Sometimes people are rejecting a job opportunity due to their age or other circumstances. Is it a negative or a positive approach? Give your opinion and relevant examples. 61
- In some countries a few people earn extremely high salaries Some people think that this is good for a country whiles others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn Discuss both view and give your opinion 73
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23512747875 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80684369821 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56657223796 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.9346687357 49.4020404114 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.153846154 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1538461538 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24741378763 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878173719753 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592111114484 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15156443576 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00534159913065 0.056905535591 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23512747875 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80684369821 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56657223796 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.9346687357 49.4020404114 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.153846154 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1538461538 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24741378763 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878173719753 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592111114484 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15156443576 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00534159913065 0.056905535591 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.