Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences. Others, however, believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime.
Over the past few years, the prevailing problem of mitigating the rate of crime has drawn public attention. People have different views about whether giving a longer time for the prisoner or carrying out alternative solutions brings forward beneficial ramifications. I incline to agree with the latter opinion.
On one side of the argument, there are a few rationales to demonstrate why many hold a belief that expanding a period of time in prison could reap an array of vital benefits. The reason is that implementing this measure is considered as one of the primary solutions minimizing a multitude of threats to the offenders. In fact, the long-term punishment in prison acts as a hassle for them to refresh themselves or get essential support when returning back to society. This action not only to pose a plethora of threats to the prisoners but also to generate typical models for the community, and thus the rate of crime will be mitigated instantly. Taking Singapore as shinning as an example, to alleviate the proportion of offenders, Singapore’s governments and authorities have triggered far-reaching changes such as increasing the time for the punishment of offenders. As a result, Singapore is known as for the safety country around the world, and thus it hardly finds it challenging to look for criminal activity.
As far as criminal allleviation is concerned, I would partially comply that opting other efficient measures due to the lowered rate of crime, which reaps an array of beneficial ramifications. First and foremost, governments should exert their power to generate some meetings for citizens to raise their perceptions when it comes to disastrous repercussions derived from these criminal activities. The consequences not only to conceive the significant effect of turning on crime but also put an end to this onerous problem. In other words, it is of paramount importance that the regulation regarding crime needs triggering far-reaching changes by the authorities. They are likely to enforce stern laws which act as a deterrence, posing a multitude of threats to offenders with harsh punishments. As a result, the number of offenders could be minimized, creating a safer community.
In conclusion, in spite of the essential function of long-term custodial sentences performs in respect of crime prevention, I strongly hold a belief that there are more appropriate methods that could be imposed with the intention of curbing crime.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-08-17 | teacher.anh | 92 | view |
2022-04-28 | vananhxh2005 | 61 | view |
2022-02-23 | Lunar Tran | 61 | view |
2021-08-18 | lennie.butera | 84 | view |
2021-01-31 | Sprios_D | 84 | view |
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Do you agree disagree with this view 84
- Many sports players advertise sports related products What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 73
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people say that what children watch influences their behaviour Others believe the amount of time they spend on television influences their behaviour most Discuss both view and give your opinion 89
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences Others however believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...are a few rationales to demonstrate why many hold a belief that expanding a period of tim...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...why many hold a belief that expanding a period of time in prison could reap an array of vital ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'returning'.
Suggestion: returning
...hemselves or get essential support when returning back to society. This action not only to pos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 986, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'looking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: looking
...and thus it hardly finds it challenging to look for criminal activity. As far as cri...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, regarding, so, thus, as for, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in other words, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2079.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 394.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27664974619 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08140329268 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56345177665 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7782190697 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.9375 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138722001981 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414687640132 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425810138558 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948493629553 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337882095223 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.