The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.
Do you agree with this statement?
Over the past thousands years the question regarding aid to arts has been debatable among the people. However, nowadays authorities provide a lot of money to art but individuals believe that it is waste of finances. I totally support the government and believe that arts are so necessary in each life.
Firstly, any genres of art inspire people and it aids them in obtaining high thinking. In other words, art is incredibly crucial for everyone who can think and imagine something serious in comparison to people who lack imagination. Therefore, art serves as an inspiration for people to create anything that they feel in themselves; it can be a wide range of creations whether it is music or art. For example, my friend whose name is John composes music, he derives inspiration from the depths of the soul and embodies it in music. Thus, some situations that inspired one person can be an incentive for them to commence art.
Secondly, the art is the same industry such as doctors or educators. Respectively why they cannot obtain assistance from the authorities? Likewise, the art must be supported by the government due to the fact that it also bestows abundant useful things. For example, from the origin of humanity people drew on the rocks what they crave to receive, whether it is mammoth or a fire. Hence, the art has always been really crucial and it has to be supported by the country leaders.
To conclude, I strongly agree with the statement that elected officials should provide financial support and encourage such industry as art.
- Even though doctors advise old people to get more exercise many old people do not get enough What are the reasons for this What are some possible solutions for this 78
- People are now living in a throwaway society where things are used for a short period of time and then thrown away What are the causes of this and what problems does it cause 67
- Many people think that museums will be replaced by technology as most information can be found free online Others believe that museums are still important Will museums no longer be needed in the future Is this a positive development 67
- Many feel that happiness is mainly an individual responsibility while others feel that there are important external factors Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Today the internet has created that chance for ordinary people to become famous Is it a positive or negative development 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, likewise, really, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92395437262 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69459715926 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596958174905 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0876906731 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.5 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2857142857 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154121348289 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545091634098 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430895551158 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105182317457 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036246416043 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.