Many animal species in the world are becomeing extinct nowadyas. Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out, while others say we should concentrate more on problems of human beings. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is true that a great number of animals are in danger in modern society. It is often argued that mankind should save wildlife from extinction rather than focusing on issues faced by humans. From my point of view, I can understand two opposing views.
On the one hand, no one can stop inevitable extinction of animals as it is a natural process of evolution. Some animal species disappear according to environmental change like dinosaur. In addition, a large number of citizens in developing countries around the world are suffering from poverty, famine, wars, water pollution and natural disasters. Some people think that protecting basic human right should be the primary consideration therefore more expenditure should be earmarked for practical sectors to improve people’s living standard as public funds are limited.
On the other hand, animal preservation is imperative as they play a vital role in our ecosystem in many ways. Genetic diversity gives us more options in the face of rapid environmental change whether that change is due to climate conditions or a new disease. Without effort to conserve wildlife in danger, it will result in reduction of species variety. The removal of a single species can offset a chain reaction affecting many others as species interact and rely on each other. For instance, a great sum of flowering plants is pollinated by animals and these plants develop foods which support a countless animals, including human. The disappearance of pollinator like bees can bring catastrophic consequences on entire planet. Some environmental damage can be reserved and some failing ecosystems can be revived. However extinction is a irrevocably final.
In conclusion, although both views have validity, I believe that government and international organizations should join hands together to conserve animal species.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-09 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-06 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-04 | hellielts | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-11 | mmy | 73 | view |
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for you 89
- Nowadays there are many television advertisements aimed at children What are the effects of these advertisements on children Should TV advertisements be controlled 89
- Many animal species in the world are becomeing extinct nowadyas Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out while others say we should concentrate more on problems of human beings Discuss both views and give 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ntal change like dinosaur. In addition, a large number of citizens in developing countries around...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 609, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'animal'?
Suggestion: animal
...develop foods which support a countless animals, including human. The disappearance of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 817, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...some failing ecosystems can be revived. However extinction is a irrevocably final. I...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 839, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s can be revived. However extinction is a irrevocably final. In conclusion, al...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40549828179 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96116661024 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635738831615 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7141965711 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3125 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312702499784 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811666370682 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474142436862 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172458045341 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491644742265 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.