In some parts of the world, it's becoming increasingly popular to try to find out the history of their own family. why do you think people do this? Do you think it's a positive or negative development?
In this concurrent world, it is undoubtedly true that the study of genealogy is becoming more popular among some countries of world. Some people concur that find out family history is fruitful, whereas some people argue that it is nagative development. However, I quibble from them and propound that study of family history has many advantages and also some disadvantages. In this essay, I will cite light on some reasons which surround my point of view before a logical conclusion is reached.
Adequate evidences are obtainable to substantiate the concept of genealogy study. The top-notch concrete reason is that ones can find out about family's past culture and tradition. Moreover, he or she also can know about his ancestors and their life-style. For example, how they were lived, what they were doing their occupation, how they were behaved, and many more things. Another rationale can be considered which hauls me to patron is that people enjoy themselves by doing family research because it's become their hobby. To uphold my notion, I would quote an instance of America and other western domains where young generation shows their interest in genealogy by doing various surveys, stamp collecting, and interviews. The rearmost coherent factor which cannot be neglected is that people can find out their long relative cousins who living and also know about heir. Hence, it is unquestionable to say that genealogy is positive development.
What is half full for some, may appear half empty to others. So public in general tend to distinguish that this trend of knowing about family history is nagative which has multifarious reasons. To commence with, some people deem that it is becoming obsession to many people and they spend lots of money and time behind this research which is totally worthless; because they forget that they are living in present and it influences more their future not the past. In addition, they also uphold that sometime person may know about past hostilities and it's may be dangerous.
All in All, it can be seen that there are innumerable strong factors supporting the study of the family history. However, it's contrary can be controlled. Consequently, I firmly believe that genealogy is positive development.
- Some people think that travel is necessary to learn about other nations others however think that tv and internet is best way to learn discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- Professionals like doctors teachers and lawyers contribute equally to society with non professionals including entertainers and sportspeople Thus they should receive equal pay Do you agree or disagree with this statement Use specific reasons and examples 84
- Some people believe that anyone can create art such as painting poetry music and so on Others think that a person should have special abilities to create art Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people think that not only should professional sports and cultural enterprises be sponsored by the government but also that amateur adult and children groups should get funding Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support you 84
- Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and uses up the world s fuel resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 619, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ica and many other western domains where young generation show their interest in ...
^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'influences'?
Suggestion: influences
... that they are living in present and it influence more their future not the past. In addi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, whereas, for example, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 7.30460921844 287% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 52.0 24.0651302605 216% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1416893733 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66761807181 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542234332425 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0092599274 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3157894737 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3157894737 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224727010153 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646559637899 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540222806059 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126841281091 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707450834582 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.