Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In recent years, tourism is becoming one of the spearhead industry, especially foreign tours, in many countries. Many people think that this industry is likely to cause conflict. However, I believe that international tourism greatly facilitates understanding between people of different cultural background.
In fact, there are many visitors arrived in a strange country, they were shocked by local culture. With a typical example, many Western tourists are shocked to learn that Vietnamese eat dog meets. After that, some people understood and though it was a cultural feature, while others said they would never come to Vietnam anymore until there is a ban on dog meat consumption. Another example is Chinese tourists' inappropriate and selfish behaviour during a buffet in a Thai tour destination a few years ago. Even though these examples did not speak the rest of the Western and Chinese populations have this way of thinking and behaving, as a matter of fact, it has also created tension between the countries involved.
However, travelling abroad is not only a great way to relax and reduce stress but also have the opportunity to experience different cultures and traditions in a genuine way. Travellers would enhance their understanding of other culture and they can learn useful skills after every trip instead of just sitting and studying through books. There is a famous saying:" The world is a book and people who do not travel only read one page of the book". In addition, it is a good opportunity for countries to introduce their unique culture to international friends, thereby improving and conserving long-standing cultural values.
In conclusion, international tourism allows overseas tourers to experience various cultures and therefore connects everyone through mutual understanding. In my perspective, I think that we should not judge the industry based on a number of conflict situations caused by a group of individuals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-04 | 2xhptaljahy | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-20 | chaupnh | 89 | view |
| 2022-11-17 | vishal sachdeva | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-03 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-27 | nhattram39 | 89 | view |
- The chart gives information about the number of subscribers using the phone per 100 residents in Africa between 1994 and 2004 78
- The chart below show the number of magazines sold per person in five countries in 2000 and 2010 with projected sales for 2020 84
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 89
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents Do you agree or disagree 95
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a genuine way" with adverb for "genuine"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ience different cultures and traditions in a genuine way. Travellers would enhance their underst...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... everyone through mutual understanding. In my perspective, I think that we should ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, while, as to, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37662337662 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00264121659 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6444157986 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.285714286 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225247731273 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720698081584 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750981251955 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137244233217 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072423616905 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.