Some people think that cooking food at home is wastage of time. They think that the fast food restaurants have made modern living easy and less stressful. To what extent do you agree?
There is a significant emphasis placed on fast food restaurants because there are some people who believe that take away food has made their life more convenient than cooking at home. However, I strongly disagree with this and let us analyse this further to understand the benefits and drawbacks of this trend.
Undoubtedly, fast food culture is getting popular increasingly. One of the primary reasons for this is the convenience it provides. Admittedly, with a busy and fast-paced lifestyle, it is hard for many people to spend time on cooking. For instance, having breakfast while driving to the office is so common these days, and they usually buy this food from a takeaway outlet on their way. Another reason for this popularity is the delicious and crunchy taste of many fast food products. Children are addicted to this, and consequently, they usually reject home-cooked foods. As a result, many parents tend to buy this food to satisfy their children.
However, homemade food is always considered as healthy and tastier. Nevertheless, the argument which many people use against home cooking is the time they have to spend. But with a simple lifestyle change, we can find time to cook. To elaborate, getting up a little early everyday can give plenty of time to prepare a decent meal. With modern automatic kitchen utensils, this is not a very hard thing to do. A quick homemade meal can provide both health and economic benefits. Many people usually ignore the long term health benefits, and with a simple behaviour change, people can achieve a quality life.
To recapitulate, despite the convenience provides by fast food, the long term adverse health issues are more serious. Therefore, I believe, with a small lifestyle change people can have a healthy home-cooked meal which is beneficial in many ways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-05 | christy018 | 56 | view |
- People are getting over dependent on the internet and phones Is it a positive or negative development 78
- In the past museums stored information about culture and history However nowadays this information can be found through the Internet and therefore there is no need for museums Do you agree or disagree with this view 72
- You are having a graduation party next Saturday night You have invited 50 people to celebrate at an outdoor barbecue evening which may continue into late into the night Write a letter to your elderly neighbour In your letter explain what will be happening 83
- Some people prefer to raise children in the cities while others believe that children should be raised in the countryside Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- Some people think that cooking food at home is wastage of time They think that the fast food restaurants have made modern living easy and less stressful To what extent do you agree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...To elaborate, getting up a little early everyday can give plenty of time to prepare a de...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... meal which is beneficial in many ways.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05980066445 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68370275193 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578073089701 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9578855848 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6111111111 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7222222222 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248286645627 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812370114356 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660995744245 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159279381371 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226738592671 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.