the problem of declining population of frog
The professor in the lecture and author in reading passage discuss the methods to address the problem that are able to decline population of frog. And professor offers three reasons to contradict the plans of author.
To begin with, the author in reading passage points that the use of pesticides around the area, which would threaten population of frog. And the government has to prohibit using pesticides. In the lecture, however, the professor opposes the statement given by author by a reason that setting up laws is not a economical way, since it is unfair for people who live near the area frog living to experience decline in yield of crop and competitive force in market.
In addition, the author also suggests that the problem is fungus, so only do people treat frogs on a large scale, the frog population is unlikely to decline. Nonetheless, the lecture indicate the solution is unpractical due to the fact that treatment has to be applied on each frog because it is extremely difficult to catch each frog and treat them. Moreover, the treatment will not affect their offspring so that people must treat again and again, which is significantly expensive and complicated.
Finally, the author expresses that the activities like wetlands development and use of excessive water have a negative effects on population of frog. Nevertheless, the professor contends the fact that the activities of people are not important problem for decline in the number of frog, but global warming which caused most species to die out and also prohibiting using water and build near frogs' habitats is not likely to eliminate the negative effects of global warming.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-10-07 | Wei Huan Chueh | 80 | view |
2021-09-12 | fff | 76 | view |
2021-02-18 | talelaldabous | 76 | view |
2021-01-16 | Elhamsarvari | 70 | view |
2020-12-25 | talelaldabous | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The government has already done enough to educate people the importance of food nutrition and health eating 76
- Questions Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to 69
- Questions In many places students must arrive very early in the morning to attend school Some people believe that starting the school day early is the best approach to support learning but others believe that starting the school day at a later time in the 73
- Pterosaurs 80
- Questions Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 307, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...by a reason that setting up laws is not a economical way, since it is unfair for ...
^
Line 4, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'wetlands'' or 'wetland's'?
Suggestion: wetlands'; wetland's
...thor expresses that the activities like wetlands development and use of excessive water ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, as to, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02909090909 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69003917143 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.7197529589 49.2860985944 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.3 110.228320801 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 21.698381199 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7 7.06452816374 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385962221881 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148488605454 0.0996497079465 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133424266447 0.0662205650399 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241565377056 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497816859866 0.0443174109184 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.3589403974 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.