Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that people's contribution which concerns environmental issues is insignificant and only the officials of each country and the policy of corporations can solve such global problems. This essay disagrees with that suggestion completely and will first look at such simple level of contribution as trash collection and then discuss how owners of cars can reduce the pollution which is harmful for the environment.
There is an opportunity for people to be environmentally friendly through collecting and sorting the trash in the modern society. That is to say all people individually can contribute in improving the environment using the simplest approach, namely the control personal attention to your own domestic waste. It is therefore disagreed that the humanity can do nothing with the environmental concerns. For example, in Ukraine it became new trend to collect domestic waste, ranging from plastic to heavy ones and I personally keep a tradition of trash sorting in my family due to support the program of the preservation of our environment.
In addition, it is reasonable to notice that the second sector that damages our environment, in particular contributes a lot in air pollution, is carbon dioxide. This concerns all car owners all over the world. There are a lot of possible solutions how to keep our environment clean besides becoming pedestrians. One of these solutions is the use of electric cars. Tesla Corporation, of course, a big company which supports people to buy their products, but the final decision belongs to car owners, many of them are too old fashioned to change their harmful cars on environmentally friendly one. For instance, resent research found that the use of electric cars reduces the air pollution by 43%.
In conclusion, this essay disagreed that the society can do nothing for the environment and demonstrated two possible ways how the community, collecting domestic waste and reducing air pollution, improves, by default, our environment
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- Countries with long average working hours are economically more successful than those countries which do not work long hours To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the advantages 84
- Countries should spend moneyn on trains rather than new roads Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think that it is necessary to travel abroad to learn about other countries but others think that it is not necessary to travel abroad because all the information can be seen on TV and the internet Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 638, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of the preservation of our environment. In addition, it is reasonable to notice ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 698, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cars reduces the air pollution by 43%. In conclusion, this essay disagreed that...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, look, second, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, of course, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29780564263 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07146049252 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564263322884 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4942031261 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9230769231 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161145012002 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614411059123 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846823685733 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113884650094 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655879398702 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.