In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative?
In modern society today, there have been a few factors that have transformed the texture of families and the functions that family member undertake. In my perspective, I think that this tendency has both beneficial and detrimental impacts.
Firstly, in a lot of countries, many people are now choosing to live in a nuclear family structure, where only parents and children inhabit together and grandparents dwell separately. In the past, however, it was quite popular in many nations for there or even four generations of a family to all live under the one roof. In addition, the tasks of each person living in same where are no longer as same before. For example, previously, men are the main economic breadwinner in their family and women to stay at home to cook, clean and rear the children. Nevertheless, today, there has also been a swap in the roles that various family members play. Detail, many women are choosing to work to shoulder economy, while some fathers decide to do housework instead of earning or both work together to share the economic burden.
These changes can bring both positive and negative effects. On the adverse sides, women are increasingly proving to be the main labour in many families and that upsetting solid relationships for thousands of years. As a result, the reasons for the divorced of couples soaring is often due to economic issues. Furthermore, many people need to move to large cities these days to find employment or in order to pursue their career. In other words, they will not enough time to care and teach their children, whilst grandparents who want to remain living in their hometown could not be available to help raise and care for grandchildren instead their parents. About the good parts, when women have opportunities to chase a career, instead of being a housewife, this would promote gender equality rights in society. Besides, the females share financial duties eases the burden on their male partners, who are more willing to cover household chores.
In conclusion, I believe that there are both advantageous and deleterious effects from these changes, though the impacts on each individual family will be different.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-08 | nguyenhuynhnhu233 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-07 | mimio5 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | mirsohails | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | mirsohails | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | Amna Zeeshan | 56 | view |
- The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 86
- In many places people s lifestyle is changing rapidly and this affects family relationships Do you think the advantages of those developments outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Many people say that universities should only offer places to young students with the highest marks while others say they should accept people of all ages even if they did not do well at school Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03591160221 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6835889826 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591160220994 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5274288122 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.9375 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3125 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156845131701 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525984004794 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668334397755 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899474369061 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00925983242614 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.