Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Many individuals wonder that environmental issues should be settled on a global scale whereas others presume it is good to handle with them nationally. According to point of view, if the severity of the problem is extensive then it should be discussed on the international level, otherwise minor matters should be raised within the nation.
On the one hand, few people perceive that environmental-related issues should be tackled globally, the reason behind this is that there are third world countries exist on the map. They do not have basic facilities to fulfill their needs such as food, shelter, clothing. It is an obvious cause that poor countries cannot manage environmental issues due to the unavailability of resources. Because of this reason, many people want to enlighten this matter on a broad level.
On the other hand, few people assume that environmental-related problems should be discussed within a country. In other words, it is often said that every country has several obstacles which they endure and it will not listen to their voice on global forums, there can be one of the reasons is ethnicity. Therefore, these societies of people think that the solution should be governed by the state.
Lastly, it is my belief, to find permanent solutions to these critical environmental issues, we have to understand the complexity and effectiveness of the problem. For example, If a country is suffering from natural disasters like cyclones, tornados, and global warming eta cetra. It should be highlighted immediately on various global forums like the United Nations Organization or in G20 conferences. However, other ongoing matters that also affect the environment are: pollution, burning of fossil fuels, and deforestation. It should be dealt with by the internal institutions of the country.
In conclusion, those group of people who believe that the hindrances related to the environment should be tabled the discussion on world forums since not accessible of resources, while other think that it should be looked by the internal people of a nation since it will be overlooked because of racism.
- Most people agree that money cannot be happiness Why is happiness difficult to define How people can achieve happiness 78
- Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- Life was better when technology was simpler.To what extent do you agree and disagree? 56
- It is predicted that robots are going to become increasingly important in our lives How could robots be used in the future Will this development be a positive or a negative development 61
- You have seen an advertisement for a weekend job as a local tour guide showing visitors around your city.Write a letter of application to the tourism office. In the lettergive your reasons for wanting the jobexplain why you think you can do the jobdescrib 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, lastly, look, so, then, therefore, third, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23235294118 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08133542927 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552941176471 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5354576665 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.6 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34190639788 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112778865935 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853077925695 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205112058563 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766431754399 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, lastly, look, so, then, therefore, third, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23235294118 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08133542927 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552941176471 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5354576665 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.6 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34190639788 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112778865935 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853077925695 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205112058563 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766431754399 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.