the graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries.
The line graph illustrates the number of overseas tourists visiting five countries, namely Brazil, Egypt, Malaysia, France and US during the period from 1995 to 2010.
It is noticeable that the number of international travelers coming to five countries considerably rose over the 15-years period, particularly US and France. Overall, the number of overseas visitors in France experienced the fastest growth in comparison with that of Brazil and Egypt.
In 2015, the highest figure was recorded in US with nearly 70 million travelers, followed by the second popular destination, France, with around 30 million people visiting. Over the span of 10 years, there was a significant increase in both the number of overseas tourists in US and France, approximately 90 million and 70 million respectively in 2005. From 2005, the figure for France continued its upward trend, when that of US slightly reduced. Surprisingly, til 2010, The number of people visiting France caught up US as both of them had similar number, with approximately 90 million people.
Nearly 20 million international tourist visiting Malaysia, much higher than the figures for brazil and egypt, only ranged around 10 million visitors. From 1995 to 2010, There was a dramatic rise to nearly 50 million in the number of oversea visitors in Malaysia, whereas, both the figures for Brazil and Egypt recorded a marginal growth to 15 and 18 million people respectively. It can be seen that Brazil and Egypt was the least attractive destinations for overseas travelers among 5 countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-13 | dorae | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | Nowshin Tabassum | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-12 | phamkhuyen | 100 | view |
| 2023-09-12 | phamkhuyen | view | |
| 2023-09-07 | polarrrr | view |
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line services 2001 2010 67
- The graph shows the average number of Vietnamese students studying in France Russia and America between 2000 and 2015 73
- The average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line services 2001 2010 67
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, whereas, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24596774194 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86159386232 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516129032258 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 385.2 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3130287571 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.1 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0723471784488 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366459443174 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514855806061 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0665077045469 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440283909291 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.