In the modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals as food or other products, such as medicines and clothing. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that we these days no longer to depend on animals to generate goods such as food, medicines and clothing items. In my perspective, I totally agree with this view and the following essay will present my opinion about it.
To begin with, with the rapid development of technology and science, people have been able to produce meat made from plants. Appeared for the first time in the Consumer Electronics Exhibition in Las Vegas and pork created of vegetable proved its value in aspects shape, taste, texture, all of which are like real meat. That not only assure nutritional quality but also have savour similar to traditional flesh. Besides, reducing the need to use animal meat in meals will bring benefits to human health. Many studies show that meats of animals have high in calories and saturated fat which lead to weight gain and belly fat that increases the risk of diseases like atherosclerosis, hypertension, osteoarthritis pain and myocardial ischemia in people who regularly eat meat. Therefore, applying a plant-based diet not only provides sufficient nutrients for our body to function normally but also help us prevent potential issues related to health.
In term of apparel, I strongly believe that it is not necessary to sacrifice an animal's life for a jacket or a dress. These days, artificial fur and high-quality synthesised fabric are being used to replace animal's fur or other body parts. In fact, medicines that manufactured from wildlife's body parts received little endorsement in the past and are not supported by society. Many species like rhinos and tiger have been hunted for medicament so much that they are on the list of the most endangered species so killing animals for medical purposes should be banned. Instead, we can use herbs and many other kinds of plant-based medicines, such as ginseng, can cure many illnesses, prolong human life expectancy and aid doctors in the treatment.
In conclusion, with the reason aforementioned above, I think that we do not need to continue killing animals to serve social demands due to the fact that they can be perfectly replaced by vegetarian food, artificial clothing and herbs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-15 | hieu13092006 | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-22 | mingchou265 | 84 | view |
| 2021-04-09 | hakinguyen | 84 | view |
| 2021-04-09 | hakinguyen | 84 | view |
- Some people say that the increasing business and cultural contact between countries is a positive development while others think that many countries will lose their national identities as a result Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008 47
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals as food or other products such as medicines and clothing Do you agree or disagree 95
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- Nowadays young people spend too much of their free time in shopping malls Some people fear that this may have negative effects on young people and the society they live in To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...hat it is not necessary to sacrifice an animals life for a jacket or a dress. These day...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, so, therefore, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06983240223 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7556584411 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620111731844 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.2050998369 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.642857143 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18129844485 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585264291746 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720251809757 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117776050986 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646636013576 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.