Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees, while others have free entry.
Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages.
In recent decades, there is a significant increase in tourists who not only come from domestic regions but also overseas and museums or art galleries are one of an attractive destination for them. however, some museums and art galleries charge entrance fees towards visitors, besides, the rest of that provide it at free-of-charge. this essay would discuss both pros and cons of the approach.
There several justifications as to why the entrance fees should be demanded an exhibition in museums or art galleries to maintain management system as well as facilities stably. In particular, museums and art galleries have been raised fund by a government agency, however, this capital is limited and unwarranted museums’ operation effectively. Hence, it can pay some costs such as electric and water bill os staff salary. In addition to this, it will provide profit to art galleries and management can collect more equipment to conserve ancient objects without damaging them. Moreover, with returns from the entrance fee, museums can hold several free-of-charge social campaigns for children or the public regularly.
On the other hand, the giant drawback of charging any fee to entry is that making museums is not attractive with lower-income people as they opt for other entertainment like cinema or café instead of paying for museums. As a matter of fact, a museum is to introduce the local community or great educational and historical value which people come to explore culture especial youngsters. Regarding entrance fees, it makes people find uncomfortable when they come here and they are rarely returning.
In conclusion, despite benefits a stable source of profit besides the government’s fund, the drawbacks of an admission fee are overshadowed. I am strongly convinced that museums and art galleries should be free-of-charge to attractive tourist and inhabitants
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-05 | Nowshin Tabassum | 61 | view |
| 2022-12-12 | mary.ssherr | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-19 | damn999 | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-21 | Sukh-73 | 61 | view |
| 2021-12-21 | Sukh-73 | 61 | view |
- the graph below shows electricity production (in terawatt hours) in France between 1980 and 2012 73
- Some people thinh that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are play in teams like football while other people thinh that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five european countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to scotland who visited four different attraction from 1980 to 2010 67
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals as food or other products such as medicines and clothing Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... of an attractive destination for them. however, some museums and art galleries charge ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...t of that provide it at free-of-charge. this essay would discuss both pros and cons ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a matter of fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37627118644 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03931152336 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610169491525 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1944824441 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8461538462 7.06120827912 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319364821872 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103720053094 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801588611783 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190416802145 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346099315618 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.