Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
In this contemporary era, domestic waste disposal and recycling is a major issue to deal with. Some people accord that it can be better deal by making some stringent rules by the authorities, to motivate people to recycle the waste. However, i believe along with imposing rules, government should also educate people about the methods and benefits of reprocessing to create awareness among them.
To commence it, the role of laws in increasing the recycling of household waste would surely prove constructive in many ways. To illustrate it, if government impose heavy financial penality to people not following law, then others will get a lesson from them and will have no choice then to follow the rules. Moreover, ministries should also give the color coding to the different categories of waste, thus to initiate the segrigation before disposal of waste. This will help the companies, who are dealing with waste disposal and its recycling, to deal with the particular type of waste safely. Hence, surely, laws will engander fear among people, which will force them to recycle the waste.
Along with laws, education can be seen as long- term solution to increase recycling. Government can organize some television shows or create some short videos featuring some famous celebrities, to explain about, how we can reprocess the reusable waste and can get benefits out of that. Likewise, they also can start some campaign with an alluring slogan to generate self motivation among people to reprocess the waste. Consequently, not only the amount of waste will decrease, if the laws and education will be strictly in effect, but also recycling will become a habit of people.
To sum up, stringent rules and spread of knowledge has a likelihood to change the practices of people dealing with the domestic waste.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- the charts show information about the number of kilometers traveled in an average month and distribution of vehicle types in Britain 78
- Many people think that zoos are cruel Others think they are helpful in protecting rare animals Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 71
- In many countries sports and exercises classes are replaced with the academic subjects Discuss the effects of this trend 78
- The government should lower the budget on the arts in order to allocate more money to education To what extent do you agree 94
- The first car appeared on British roads in 1888 By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use To what ex 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...e people to recycle the waste. However, i believe along with imposing rules, gove...
^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrities'.
Suggestion: celebrities
...create some short videos featuring some famous celebrities, to explain about, how we can reprocess...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, then, thus, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11784511785 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62160080072 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569023569024 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7081409623 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.923076923 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235290276729 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902685544145 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615635724117 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146060515316 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693021519326 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.