Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.
Television ads are essential both for the owner of a company and also for consumers. Consumers get to know the products very quickly. However, Tv ads sometimes create a wrong impact, mainly when it is directed towards young children.
Some tv advertisings present food items like chocolate, which contain high sugar that bad for children’s health, persuade children to buy them. Children at this particular age cannot judge right or harmful things for themselves. They, however, tend to get attracted by any catchy things that any television ad provides a full percentage. Thus, children want the product from that tv ad, and if they do not get it initially, they start crying that make their parents buy it for them despite knowing the harmful side.
Children at the age of two to five love to imitate anything they find exciting. That’ s a good thing because most of the time they learn good things having a pleasant environment around them. But the problem arises when imitating things cause danger. For example, last year, my little brother jumped from a wardrobe, which is quite high from the ground, after drinking a kid’s juice and broke his left leg. Later we found out that he got the idea of this kind of action from a TV ad, where a kid drinks juice and gets the somewhat superman type ability to fly. So, it is quite clear that TV ads play roles that bring destructive acts sometimes.
In addition to the above causes, TV ads often create pressure on the parents. Children do not have an understanding of anything related to the financial state. Sometimes tv ads with Disney land or wonderland type parks make the children forcing their parents to go there. Nevertheless, having a money problem, parents eventually do so. If there is no ad regarding this type, parents would be less stressed and able to spend that money on the other well-being of their children.
To conclude, it is clear from the above points that there should be no disagreement that television advertising should not directed towards children age between two to five
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-12 | Iman karim | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Iman karim | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 90 | view |
| 2023-05-13 | Thomas2028 | 66 | view |
| 2023-04-24 | sonyeoso | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: ESSENTIAL_ESSENTIALLY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'essentially'?
Suggestion: essentially
Television ads are essential both for the owner of a company and als...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'direct'
Suggestion: direct
... that television advertising should not directed towards children age between two to fiv...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, thus, well, for example, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84135977337 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56344981383 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589235127479 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5732386097 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9473684211 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5789473684 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15789473684 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252236802387 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768199042962 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127909259738 0.0737576698707 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190057600201 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.18181514844 0.0645574589148 282% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.