Ensuring that children have regular physical exercise should be the responsibility of parents and therefore schools should not waste valuable school time having sports lessons as part of the curriculum. To what extend do you agree?
Because of all the worthy effects of exercising on humans, the ways of stimulating them to be active have been controversial issues among people. Although some give all the responsibilities to parents, others have thought of schools as the main encouraging factor. I myself do not concur with the view of parents to be the only principle ones to be in charge of this problem.
Actually, there are several reasons to blame schools if some children have not been encouraged to do sports. The first main one which should be mentioned here, is the fact that they have been spending much amount of their time in educational departments. For instance, children have gone to their classes for about 8 hours and even more in order to be taught various tasks including sports. Consequently, schools have had not only the main impacts on their behavior and knowledge, but also have had power to cheer them up to do some activities.
In addition, the environment of these schools’ classes has been believed as the perfect one. They could learn how to be beneficial. Moreover, they have been taught by professional tutors who knows how to behave in front of them as well as surrounding by group of teenagers who are in the similar age level. Under those circumstance, they have been more enthusiastic to try various tasks. On the other hand, as parents are much older than them and have sometimes been acting like bosses, this has led them not to obey their rules or their sayings.
In conclusion, everyone who has come and gone in children’s lives has had substantial influences on them. But between schools which have had both much amount of time and better conditions of teaching rather than parents, I think entrusting schools to make students exercise is more wisely.
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 67
- linear process 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
- The following diagram shows how greenhouse gases trap energy from the sun 78
- The manufacturing and use of cars damages the environment but their popularity is increasing Why is this How could this be controlled 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88079470199 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72450363321 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55298013245 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7772742397 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.285714286 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262348908859 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945914145571 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492436071736 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168498426444 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523775585541 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.