College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
In this modern age, productivity is the yardstick of an economically stable society and the assertion that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in the market serves to realize that outcome. It can be argued that the consequence in support of the assertion leads to the marginalization of other fields of study that are less practical, especially in the arts and humanities, undermining cultural development. However, I believe that the opposite would occur: the more stable a society is, the amount of leisure time that people can afford to have would increase, allowing people to pursue more creative interests.
Choosing a field of study with a large availability of jobs is important to students that want healthy and stable lives in the future. Even though the particular field may not be of interest to the student, the stability of the future job would grant the means and resources to engage in activities outside of their job such as spending time and caring of their families or pursuing certain hobbies. The society as a whole would benefit as well. With more people filling in jobs that are in high demand, productivity as a whole increases, generating wealth within the society.
Conversely, it would seem that the increase of people filling higher-demand jobs also implies a decrease of lower-demand jobs, and certain fields of study such as the arts and humanities would be increasingly marginalized. I stand by my point that a solid economic foundation of a society would actually allow more people to pursue creative fields, which in turn serves to develop the culture of a society. Lawrence Berk, the founder of the highly-reputed Berklee College of Music, initially graduated from MIT with a degree in architectural engineering. During WWII, the demand for engineers rocketed and he would go on to work as a mechanical engineer. But he always had a passion for music education and would teach part-time. By working in a practical field that was in high demand, he was able to become financially stable and have the means to pursue his passion for teaching and establish a savvy and modern music school. It is now the largest independent music college in the world.
To summarize, supporting the idea that students should pursue fields that have a larger availability of jobs will result in economic prosperity. Although the negative aspects of marginalization of other fields is a valid argument against the assertion, economic stability would allow for these to fields to flourish rather than disappear.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-23 | Nanggyu Park | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Jhon Kwame | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | wopona8219 | 54 | view |
| 2023-10-05 | sahil nain | 62 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | Winner | 66 | view |
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 62
- Some people believe it is often necessary even desirable for political leaders to withhold information from the public Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed 50
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, conversely, however, may, so, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06807511737 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91761752291 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485915492958 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1163188568 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.9375 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355579218449 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115867809185 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137597378739 0.0758088955206 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243106446999 0.150359130593 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861000866977 0.0667264976115 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.