Genetic engineering is a dangerous trend. It should be limited.
To what extent do you agree?
In the ultra-modem epoch, it is a moot point that development of genetic engineering has several hazardous consequences; therefore, it needs to be curtailed. A significant chunk of the community welcomes the conception, whereas the remaining members oppose the same. This essay of mine will shed light on my personal standpoint.
I am in agreement to large extent with the aforementioned notion. Multifarious reasons can be discussed to justify my stance. The most conspicuous one is dangerous outcomes of changing the genes of a child. In other words, parents want to choose their children’s characteristics before they born. It is against our ethics of life, which might lead to destruction of society’s moral values and rules. Additionally, genetically modified plants have little nutritional value. As a result, it might cause problems for the human’s body in the long term.
My viewpoint can be made evident by adding a few more arguments. Ecosystem of Earth will be affected by altering the genes of living animals. Some of them might live like longer and disrupt life-cycle of death and born.
On the other hand, I do have some grounds against the central idea. First and foremost, genetically modified crops grow faster and bigger. Hence, it can help farmers to fulfill the need of foods, especially in the developing countries. Secondly, inherited ailments can be omitted by modification of genes. Consequently, humans can live longer and have a healthier life than the past.
To put it in a nutshell, I personally believe that limiting genetic experiments is better for humans and ecosystem; however, the latter approach should not be glossed over.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- When a country develops its technology the traditional skills and ways of life die out It is pointless to try and keep them alive To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead Discuss both views and give your opinion 48
- Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labour Therefore working hours should be reduced To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Genetic engineering is a dangerous trend It should be limited To what extent do you agree 61
- Some people think that economic development is the only way to end world poverty and hunger Others argue that economic development is damaging the environment and needs to stop Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 78
Comments
could anyone give me proper…
could anyone give me proper band score for it ?/??
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 291, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'bore'?
Suggestion: bore
... children’s characteristics before they born. It is against our ethics of life, whic...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04598993584 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652985074627 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0233519456 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.0526315789 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1052631579 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78947368421 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168999345478 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404602946664 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438185903338 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088085336165 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374191352965 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.