Technology allows us to have a helpful and interesting life than in the past. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of "technology allows us to have a helpful and interesting life than in the past" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that the traditional life might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that technology can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, having a helpful and interesting life than in the past because of technology can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that the invention of new devices and promoting the life quality are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of technologies in societies. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both improving the human works and eliminating the intensive handwork distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of science, without the slightest doubt, the lack of technology in our life might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of lifestyles. Moreover, fundamental aspects of an interesting life can relate to the reality that the demerits of sophisticated devices can pertain to the lack of skills. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of new technologies were correlated positively with human intelligence, the local authorities would ultimately address the problems of robotics. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of the artificial intelligence.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of having a helpful and interesting life because of technology far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-10 | woutan | 77 | view |
| 2020-08-15 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2019-03-29 | joyspacechou0130 | 94 | view |
| 2019-03-21 | Kushi | 95 | view |
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 75
- Business whether big or small is to maximize profit Do you agree with that Give your opinion 49
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- n the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Experience is more effective and useful than books and formal education To what extent do you agree with this opinion 88
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67346938776 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37675453543 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.2158447684 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.636363636 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7272727273 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293996644824 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966935882138 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111049319029 0.071462118173 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176192318787 0.151781067708 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588322502424 0.0609392437508 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 12.6369458128 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67346938776 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37675453543 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.2158447684 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.636363636 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7272727273 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293996644824 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966935882138 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111049319029 0.071462118173 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176192318787 0.151781067708 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588322502424 0.0609392437508 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 12.6369458128 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.