Task 1: The picture below shows the use of renewable energy accounting the total energy from 1971 to 2006.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The line graph compares six different countries in terms of the percentage of renewable energy used in total energy over the period 60 years.
Overall, the usage of renewable energy in five out of six countries went up. It is evident that renewable energy was used the most in Finland and Denmark.
In 1971, Finland accounted for the highest percentage compared to other countries, at nearly one-quarter. During the rest of the years, energy utilized by Finland fluctuated between 15% and 25%. From 1971 to 2011, Denmark experienced a rapid downward trend in renewable energy use and this figure hit the lowest point at about one in ten in 1986, before climbing by well-over 5% in the end year.
Regarding remaining other countries, in 1971, starting at just-under 10%, the utilization of renewable energy in France increased to about 20% in 2011. By contrast, in 1971, the proportions of renewable energy use in other countries were under 6%. However, by 2011, the energy consumption in the US had grown to approximately one-fifth and took over that of Denmark.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-15 | Zahid6400 | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-15 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-30 | christine221 | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-17 | thiên định | 51 | view |
| 2020-08-12 | giang.@ | 78 | view |
- the bar chart show the distribution of employment among agriculture services and industries in three countries in 1980 and projected distribution in 2020 67
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 73
- the diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drink cans 87
- the illustrations show how chocolate is produced 64
- Cyclists and car drivers today share the same road cause some problems What are the problems What can be done do to reduce these problems 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed by Finland fluctuated between 15% and 25%. From 1971 to 2011, Denmark experien...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73926961626 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573033707865 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4633864703 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8888888889 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25484340325 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121022661516 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511785020147 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174655371576 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151202138052 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.