The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of population aged 65 and above in three countries.
The given table illustrates information about the modification in the proportion of the population who are 65 years old and over in Canada, Germany and UK from 1988 to 2000 and an estimated proportion in 2030.
It can be seen from the table that the population of elderly people is predicted to increase in all countries during the research period. Additionally, the percentage of senior inhabitants in Germany was highest between 1988 and 2000 and is forecast to remain the highest by 2030.
During the period from 1988 to 2000, the aging population in Germany and Canada went up by 5% to 25% and 21% respectively. Meanwhile, in the UK, the proportion of its senior population increased by only 1%, ending the year 2000 with just 15%.
By 2030, it is predicted that the percentage of population aged 65 and over in all 3 nations will increase by 5%. Germany is forecast to be the country with most elderly people among 3 countries. The proportion of senior residents in Canada and the UK will be 26% and 20% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-06 | Han Duyen | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-30 | Linh Nguyen Phan | view | |
| 2021-08-30 | Linh Nguyen Phan | view | |
| 2021-08-30 | Linh Nguyen Phan | 100 | view |
| 2021-08-16 | KEVA | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words
- Many people are travelling to other countries Why Is it a positive or negative development 73
- Films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative 67
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ion in the proportion of the population who are 65 years old and over in Canada, German...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73184357542 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8654262479 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486033519553 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.898509455 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.875 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191071713388 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917067758685 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786744002153 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125062461195 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308850792594 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.