Watching a live performance such as a play, concert, or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Nowadays, people are able to enjoy performances including plays, concerts or sporting events at home via their televisions instead of attending live ones. Although this method can have certain interesting points, numerous people, including me, still support the idea that watching live at the venue is much more delightful due to various reasons
On the one hand, there is a variety of explanations for why people prefer spectating a performance on TV, but the fundamental reasons may come from the convenience and easy accessibility when watching. By viewing through television, spectators are allowed to save a great deal of time and troubles of travelling a long distance as well as waiting in line in order to buy tickets. Another reason that is worth considering is the sitting position. It is irrefutable that the seating arrangement can greatly affect the comfort of seeing the whole show if the seats are far from the stage or playground. Watching at home, on the contrary, help the audience to keep up with the performance in a more clear way as the show is recorded by cameraman
Nevertheless, attending a live performance can bring unique experiences that television never could. Among them, one thing that stands out is the exciting atmosphere at the venue. In some events, especially in the sports field, this factor plays an important role in creating satisfaction and excitement. The cheering crowd mixed with the instrumental sound created by thousands of people in the stadium is probably a perfect case in point. In the second place, both the visual and sound quality of television cannot compare with that of a live show. Therefore, it is not likely to satisfy fastidious audiences, particularly in the theatrical performance namely symphony, opera or chamber musical concerts
In conclusion, despite all the convenience and easy accessibility of television, watching a live performance at the venue still outweighed due to its exciting atmosphere as well as outstanding quality in both the visual and sound aspect
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-30 | hien3112 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | dinhngocquynh2003 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | Pham Van Nhan | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-13 | trinhthanh1 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-13 | trinhthanh1 | 67 | view |
- Many people are now spending more and more time travelling to work or school some people believe that this has negative development while others think there are some benefits Discuss both view and give your opinion 84
- The table below shows the percentage of the population who rode bicycles in one town by the age group in 2012 Summarise the important information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- An increased number of people today change their career and living places in their lives Is it a positive or negative development 78
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000 2005 and 2010 about one university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...clusion, despite all the convenience and easy accessibility of television, watchi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as, on the contrary, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34954407295 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99904980903 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589665653495 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 109.416937061 49.4020404114 221% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 160.0 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9090909091 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5454545455 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220396183538 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704272903412 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699967579847 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128097772812 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611591575545 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.