In some countries people spend long hours at work. Why does this happen? Is it positive or negative development?
In many parts of the work, the fact that employees working overtime has been increasingly popular. While there are several reasons for this practice, I believe that this is a negative trend.
Spending long hours at the workplace may stem from several reasons. The first one could be that many people think working hard means making great contribution to their company. This can be best exemplified by looking at many Japanese workers. They believe that working long hours is an indicator of dedication and loyalty, and therefore, they usually stay at work latter in the day in a hope that they can make greater contribution to their companies. Another reason might be that some people want to climb the corporate ladder faster than others. This means that they have few choices but to work harder than many of their colleagues to hone their job-related skills and hands-on experience. As a result, they many stand a higher chance to get promoted or receive a bigger salary offer.
Although I understand why many people have to work far into the night these days, I think that this is a negative trend. For one thing, when working overtime in the long haul, people are likely to suffer from a heavy pressure, which is the main cause for many potential diseases such as mental disorder. This is not to say they may have some health problems related to a sendetary lifestyle which results from a lack of time for active activities outside work. For another, working long hours also means that people have sacrifice valuable time spent with their family. I believe that family is the most important thing in the world, and it is not worth giving up this time for anything, even work.
In conclusion, While several reasons for which people spend long hours hours at work can be obvious, I would argue that this is more of a negative trend, and that we should try to reach work life balance as posible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-27 | phamkhuyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-27 | Fila | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-11 | Sushmabenarji | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-03 | uyenhuynh2 | 56 | view |
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen Is it positive or negative development 73
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen and is it positive or negative development 78
- Some people think that sports games are very important for society Others however argue that is nothing more than a leisure activity Discus both views and give your own opinion 84
- Individuals should not be allowed to carry guns Do you agree or disagree 61
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen Is it positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 712, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun stand seems to be countable; consider using: 'many stands'.
Suggestion: many stands
... hands-on experience. As a result, they many stand a higher chance to get promoted or rece...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 66, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: hours
...ral reasons for which people spend long hours hours at work can be obvious, I would argue t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75226586103 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37078709062 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537764350453 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3732177489 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.866666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3161794172 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114991657247 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687519388357 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216054384357 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494684653401 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.